|
|
Post by blcoach8 on May 29, 2018 15:07:47 GMT -6
www.nytimes.com/2018/05/29/business/media/roseanne-barr-offensive-tweets.htmlMore censorship. Those liberal bitches on The View can say anything and ABC does nothing about it. Roseanne says Chelsea Clinton is tied to George Soros adn that Valerie Jarrett looks like the Muslim brotherhood and the planet of the Apes had a baby and her show is immediately canceelled........ABC promotes free speech as long as it is liberals doing the speaking. Roseanne made an accurate observation of Obam'as Iranian adviser but it was a little racist, but, funny as hell. I liked the show. The View is trash and should be cancelled for the things Joy Behar and that ugly ass Whoopi Boldberg say about President Trump.........ABC says it is OK to bash the president with all sorets of crap but don't say anything about the bitch who advised Obama. 
|
|
|
|
Post by sempersmom on May 29, 2018 16:15:00 GMT -6
It's a double standard. Roseanne did go overboard but like you said, those women on The View get away with the same thing each and every day.
|
|
|
|
Post by astrosdoug on May 29, 2018 17:31:51 GMT -6
I don't get to watch :American TV where I live (can't say I've shed a tear over that, except when it has caused me to miss a baseball game I wanted to see), and I don't know much about Roseanne, but I've been studying Valerie Jarrett for years. The article below is a good summary of how/why she became connected to various groups whose mission it is to overthrow the constitutional republic of the United States. Their main strategy was to wed Islamic terrorism to racially divisive politics in the United States. Gee, wonder why we've seen so much of that in recent years? reclaimourrepublic.wordpress.com/2013/11/30/1979-newspaper-article-by-valerie-jarrett-father-in-law-reveals-start-of-muslim-purchase-of-u-s-presidency/ "26 November, 2013 by AmyElizabeth Pat Dollard –Why would Muslim oil billionaires finance and develop controlling relationships with black college students? Well, like anyone else, they would do it for self-interest. And what would their self-interest be? We all know the top two answers to that question: 1. a Palestinian state and 2. the advancement of Islam in America. The idea then was to advance blacks who would facilitate these two goals to positions of power in the Federal government, preferably, of course, the Presidency. And why would the Arabs target blacks in particular for this job? Well, for the same reason the early communists chose them as their vanguard for revolution (which literally means “change”) in America." (article continues) |
|
|
|
Post by astrosdoug on May 29, 2018 17:32:41 GMT -6
Roseanne's twitter has been waking too many people up over the past few months. Of course they would try to shut her up.
|
|
|
|
Post by ɮօʀȶǟʐ on May 30, 2018 0:46:49 GMT -6
The funniest part is that Rosanne has always been a liberal. A lot of people believe her “conservatism“ was just a sales job for her show.
|
|
|
|
Post by astrosdoug on May 30, 2018 2:44:34 GMT -6
A peek behind the scenes of the Roseanne debacle (from another site):
"Anyone else realize that Roseanne has single handedly catapulted Valerie Jarret and Snopes into the public conscious in 1 afternoon? Why is this great? Think about the redpill process. You can't just go in jamming shit down normies throats. You have to start with a minor situation that serves as a predicate for the redpill you're trying to drop.
(Example: voter fraud) if you go in talking about millions of illegal votes you're laughed off. But if you start w/ explaining Fast and Furious (which everyone has to accept actually occured as it's provable, not denied, & caused deaths) you can get into how the migrant crisis was started. (Poor families in fear of gangs/cartels). Then you get into who is calling for open borders and loose voting laws. (Can even point out the strategically placed migrant populations i.e. Somalis in MN) Show the change in voting demographics over the years. (Red counties turned Blue) N
ow tie it all together. You have just shown that the people screeching for open borders and loose voting laws are the same people/political party/orgs involved w/ running guns to Mexico, causing genocide, and a mass exodus, and that it was all done for political gain under the pretense of compassion for migrants. (At the same time trying to tell Americans they cannot be trusted to have the same guns the govt was providing to said Cartels)
Roseanne is setting the stage right now. How many normies know anything about Valerie Jarret? How many know snopes is not only biased but outright democrat propaganda? Not as many as will come to know, soon. Normies can't learn something new if they never even hear about the topic in the first place. Same thing POTUS does. Also why POTUS praised her before. (He's not stupid). This is thought seeding laying the groundwork for redpill season. Midterms are approaching."
|
|
|
|
Post by unionstation82 on May 30, 2018 9:55:21 GMT -6
I wish Hinch had as quick a hook with bad relievers as ABC did with Roseanne.
(Rimshot.)
|
|
|
|
Post by batman007 on Jun 4, 2018 20:28:52 GMT -6
Playing Devil's Advocate here: Why is it when a football player exercises his first amendment, the right wants him kicked out of the game, but when a TV star exercises her first amendment, the right is quick to defend?
The same goes the other way around. The left defends the football player, but condemns the TV star.
|
|
|
|
Post by bearbryant on Jun 4, 2018 20:40:03 GMT -6
Why is it when a football player exercises his first amendment, the right wants him kicked out of the game.
The right's pissed off because the media for the most part defended the players' 1st amendment right to kneel, but not Roseanne's right to roast a Democrat public official |
|
|
|
Post by bearbryant on Jun 4, 2018 21:13:32 GMT -6
I don't really understand the left's position, if someone could help me out. As best I can see, the left doesn't watch the NFL or Roseanne, yet they want to have a say in the programming decisions of both television shows
|
|
|
|
Post by unionstation82 on Jun 7, 2018 15:32:39 GMT -6
Playing Devil's Advocate here: Why is it when a football player exercises his first amendment, the right wants him kicked out of the game, but when a TV star exercises her first amendment, the right is quick to defend? The same goes the other way around. The left defends the football player, but condemns the TV star. Comparatively, which people were removed from their jobs? |
|
|
|
Post by unionstation82 on Jun 7, 2018 15:34:00 GMT -6
Personally, I dislike Kaepernick’s agenda, but I support his right to try out for teams. I think he definitely deserves a second chance. He’s no Ray Rice.
|
|
marshall
Veteran
21st Century Luddite
Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood...
Posts: 4,358 
Likes: 446
|
Post by marshall on Jun 22, 2018 1:43:25 GMT -6
Personally, I dislike Kaepernick’s agenda, but I support his right to try out for teams. I think he definitely deserves a second chance. He’s no Ray Rice. There is no RIGHT to a job, or an interview. Just an obligation on the part of employers not to discriminate illegally.
Unfortunately, many laws are unconstitutional because some of the SCOTUS believe the Constitution lives and breaths based on their own personal preferences. That is called an Oligarchy, not a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. |
|
|
|
Post by ɮօʀȶǟʐ on Jun 23, 2018 0:47:22 GMT -6
They announced today that they're bringing the Roseanne series back, but are killing off Roseanne's character (theorized that it'll be an opioid overdose).
|
|
marshall
Veteran
21st Century Luddite
Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood...
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 446
|
Post by marshall on Jun 23, 2018 3:12:10 GMT -6
They announced today that they're bringing the Roseanne series back, but are killing off Roseanne's character (theorized that it'll be an opioid overdose). The networks are committing slow suicide by their attempts to be PC to the left. The audiences will continue to shrink, even beyond the technological reasons. Even liberals are getting bored with the non-stop hate. |
|
|
|
Post by unionstation82 on Jun 23, 2018 11:14:53 GMT -6
They announced today that they're bringing the Roseanne series back, but are killing off Roseanne's character (theorized that it'll be an opioid overdose). So...what’s the point of bringing it back? |
|
|
|
Post by blcoach8 on Jun 23, 2018 11:22:50 GMT -6
They announced today that they're bringing the Roseanne series back, but are killing off Roseanne's character (theorized that it'll be an opioid overdose). TV networks are ran by liberals and knuckle under to demands of the PC idiots. For ABC to cancel Roseanne or anything else while keeping The View on the air is hypocritical. Those liberal women on The View bash the president, Christianity, and anything else that goes against the liberal agenda. CBS is worse..........they allow that little prissy queer, Stephen Colbert, to say whatever he pleases about the president while having guests like James Comey to come on and spread lies. CBS also has shows that promote the gay lifestyle and have them on at times when kids are watching TV. An example is "instinct" on Sunday night that I watched a couple of times. I suspected that the leading male was gay but when he and his lover kissed on the mouth, I changed the channel and have not watched it since. Crap like that has no business on network television. |
|
marshall
Veteran
21st Century Luddite
Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood...
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 446
|
Post by marshall on Jun 23, 2018 11:44:10 GMT -6
They announced today that they're bringing the Roseanne series back, but are killing off Roseanne's character (theorized that it'll be an opioid overdose). TV networks are ran by liberals and knuckle under to demands of the PC idiots. For ABC to cancel Roseanne or anything else while keeping The View on the air is hypocritical. Those liberal women on The View bash the president, Christianity, and anything else that goes against the liberal agenda. CBS is worse..........they allow that little prissy queer, Stephen Colbert, to say whatever he pleases about the president while having guests like James Comey to come on and spread lies. CBS also has shows that promote the gay lifestyle and have them on at times when kids are watching TV. An example is "instinct" on Sunday night that I watched a couple of times. I suspected that the leading male was gay but when he and his lover kissed on the mouth, I changed the channel and have not watched it since. Crap like that has no business on network television. Just another nail in the network coffin. |
|
koolade2
Veteran
15K Thief
#WWG1WGA
Posts: 4,239
Likes: 492
|
Post by koolade2 on Jun 23, 2018 13:17:46 GMT -6
Personally, I dislike Kaepernick’s agenda, but I support his right to try out for teams. I think he definitely deserves a second chance. He’s no Ray Rice. Anyone that thinks he came up with this on his own is Dreaming. He was seduced by that Muslim woman (girlfriend) who believed in Sharia Law and wanted to start trouble. |
|
koolade2
Veteran
15K Thief
#WWG1WGA
Posts: 4,239
Likes: 492
|
Post by koolade2 on Jun 23, 2018 13:22:45 GMT -6
TV networks are ran by liberals and knuckle under to demands of the PC idiots. For ABC to cancel Roseanne or anything else while keeping The View on the air is hypocritical. Those liberal women on The View bash the president, Christianity, and anything else that goes against the liberal agenda. CBS is worse..........they allow that little prissy queer, Stephen Colbert, to say whatever he pleases about the president while having guests like James Comey to come on and spread lies. CBS also has shows that promote the gay lifestyle and have them on at times when kids are watching TV. An example is "instinct" on Sunday night that I watched a couple of times. I suspected that the leading male was gay but when he and his lover kissed on the mouth, I changed the channel and have not watched it since. Crap like that has no business on network television. Just another nail in the network coffin. I haven't watched any network TV shows in a very long time. My wife who likes to watch a few of them has remarked to me that now every Show has at least One Gay person if not a couple. And now the latest is to have a Tranny on every show as if that is Real Life. I don't care who you want in your bedroom, just don't make me share it with you. |
|
|
|
Post by blcoach8 on Jun 23, 2018 14:17:03 GMT -6
Just another nail in the network coffin. I haven't watched any network TV shows in a very long time. My wife who likes to watch a few of them has remarked to me that now every Show has at least One Gay person if not a couple. And now the latest is to have a Tranny on every show as if that is Real Life. I don't care who you want in your bedroom, just don't make me share it with you. I don't watch many network TV shows anymore....I watch a couple of the NCIS shows and Blue Bloods. I think I may like the new 'Yellowstone" that is on the Paramount network. Liberals are using the networks to push their agenda.....especially the gay lifestyle......on the public. This crap of them claiming transgenders are normal is sickening. |
|
marshall
Veteran
21st Century Luddite
Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood...
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 446
|
Post by marshall on Jun 23, 2018 14:51:51 GMT -6
Personally, I dislike Kaepernick’s agenda, but I support his right to try out for teams. I think he definitely deserves a second chance. He’s no Ray Rice. Anyone that thinks he came up with this on his own is Dreaming. He was seduced by that Muslim woman (girlfriend) who believed in Sharia Law and wanted to start trouble. He's just another hater, though the left will never admit it. I doubt his girlfriend was needed to goad him into hating. |
|
|
|
Post by unionstation82 on Jun 23, 2018 14:59:08 GMT -6
All I’m saying is that Kaepernick is deserving of the right to try out for teams. I never said they owe him a job. What he did was really annoying but not unlawful. What Rice did was reprehensible, a PR nightmare, and especially illegal. They’re two different situations.
|
|
koolade2
Veteran
15K Thief
#WWG1WGA
Posts: 4,239
Likes: 492
|
Post by koolade2 on Jun 23, 2018 15:12:20 GMT -6
Anyone that thinks he came up with this on his own is Dreaming. He was seduced by that Muslim woman (girlfriend) who believed in Sharia Law and wanted to start trouble. He's just another hater, though the left will never admit it. I doubt his girlfriend was needed to goad him into hating. He probably was already a Hater somewhat but I truly believe she is what pushed him over the edge. If you read anything she said or did it was always anti-American. One of the ones Obama brought in just for this reason. |
|
marshall
Veteran
21st Century Luddite
Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood...
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 446
|
Post by marshall on Jun 23, 2018 15:13:30 GMT -6
All I’m saying is that Kaepernick is deserving of the right to try out for teams. I never said they owe him a job. What he did was really annoying but not unlawful. What Rice did was reprehensible, a PR nightmare, and especially illegal. They’re two different situations. You nailed the reason in your response. Professional Athletes are dependent on PR. Kaperknucklehead insulted a large portion of the fan base (Veterans and others who love this country) and the NFL chose political correctness over its customer base.
But the owners are businessmen and want no part of the PR nightmare of an unrepentant communist who only promises to continue doing the same thing if hired.
He deserves NOTHING but scorn and contempt.
|
|
koolade2
Veteran
15K Thief
#WWG1WGA
Posts: 4,239
Likes: 492
|
Post by koolade2 on Jun 23, 2018 15:14:27 GMT -6
All I’m saying is that Kaepernick is deserving of the right to try out for teams. I never said they owe him a job. What he did was really annoying but not unlawful. What Rice did was reprehensible, a PR nightmare, and especially illegal. They’re two different situations. The truth is he wasn't Good Enough to be brought into another team or it would have been done a long time ago. Team owners have shown they will employee Criminals as long as they help the team. |
|
|
|
Post by unionstation82 on Jun 23, 2018 15:20:05 GMT -6
All I’m saying is that Kaepernick is deserving of the right to try out for teams. I never said they owe him a job. What he did was really annoying but not unlawful. What Rice did was reprehensible, a PR nightmare, and especially illegal. They’re two different situations. You nailed the reason in your response. Professional Athletes are dependent on PR. Kaperknucklehead insulted a large portion of the fan base (Veterans and others who love this country) and the NFL chose political correctness over its customer base.
But the owners are businessmen and want no part of the PR nightmare of an unrepentant communist who only promises to continue doing the same thing if hired.
He deserves NOTHING but scorn and contempt.
Kaepernick has still got the right to seek employment. He never broke the law. A couple veterans I talked to said he’s a jerk but still had the right to say what he said. On a similar tangent, I don’t like the Ku Klux Klan, but stifling their speech infringes on their rights too. The bottom line is he took a gamble, and it didn’t pay off financially. He still had his right to say and do what he did. P.S. I never supported Kaepernick’s actions. |
|
|
|
Post by unionstation82 on Jun 23, 2018 15:21:08 GMT -6
All I’m saying is that Kaepernick is deserving of the right to try out for teams. I never said they owe him a job. What he did was really annoying but not unlawful. What Rice did was reprehensible, a PR nightmare, and especially illegal. They’re two different situations. The truth is he wasn't Good Enough to be brought into another team or it would have been done a long time ago. Team owners have shown they will employee Criminals as long as they help the team. I agree with that even though I don’t recall CK being a criminal. For me personally, I wouldn’t hire lawbreakers, but I think NFL owners’ hands are tied because I feel there mentally is a requirement for a type of violence (for certain positions) which correlates to overly aggressive behavior and subsequent trouble with law enforcement. A lot of shady characters such as these have NFL abilities, which may or may not be productive for winning. The NFL is relatively successful at blackballing these players. As for Kaepernick, I feel that he screwed himself with his social justice cause because it distracted him from becoming the best QB he could be and thus has kept him from being employed. Whether he likes it or not, there are talent standards that are mandatory to make it in the pros, and if you don’t make the cut, you’ve got to go. |
|
|
|
Post by blcoach8 on Jun 23, 2018 15:25:15 GMT -6
The truth is he wasn't Good Enough to be brought into another team or it would have been done a long time ago. Team owners have shown they will employee Criminals as long as they help the team. I agree with that even though I don’t recall CK being a criminal. Kaepernick is not a convicted criminal, but, he is low-class thug who shows total disrespect for our country and our military. Any owner that signs this piece of garbage needs to go bankrupt. Tlhere should be no place for trash like him, Michael Bennett, or any of the rest of that bunch of trash. |
|
marshall
Veteran
21st Century Luddite
Ephesians 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood...
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 446
|
Post by marshall on Jun 23, 2018 15:29:03 GMT -6
You nailed the reason in your response. Professional Athletes are dependent on PR. Kaperknucklehead insulted a large portion of the fan base (Veterans and others who love this country) and the NFL chose political correctness over its customer base.
But the owners are businessmen and want no part of the PR nightmare of an unrepentant communist who only promises to continue doing the same thing if hired.
He deserves NOTHING but scorn and contempt.
Kaepernick has still got the right to seek employment. He never broke the law. A couple veterans I talked to said he’s a jerk but still had the right to say what he said. On a similar tangent, I don’t like the Ku Klux Klan, but stifling their speech infringes on their rights too. The bottom line is he took a gamble, and it didn’t pay off financially. He still had his right to say and do what he did. P.S. I never supported Kaepernick’s actions. Kaperknucklehead is free to be as stupid as he wants to be. Just not on anybody elses dime or time. Freedom to speak does not include freedom from the reactions of others who exercise their free speech by rejecting him, both as a person or as an employee.
Just try telling YOUR boss that you intend to insult his biggest clients/customers when they come to HIS place of business or you're acting as HIS agent and find out how long YOU last.
|
|
